Beat 7B · Artifact 07 · Version 0.2
Growth drivers vs AI resilience. The 10x Consumer portfolio mapped across five growth drivers. AI primarily threatens one of them.
Each holding is mapped across five drivers of consumer growth — A · Income-Led Growth (rising middle-class salaries), B · Behaviour Shift (formalisation, digitalisation, convenience), C · Income Distribution (women, Tier 2/3, affluent vs. middle), D · Consolidation (organised gains from unorganised), E · New Engines (new geographies & categories). AI threat sits primarily in Driver A. Names driven by B–E are structurally more resilient. Click a row for the detail read. Toggle Edit mode to adjust driver weights and tier per holding.
Holding
A · Income-Led GrowthRising middle-class salaries & consumption
B · Behaviour ShiftFormalisation · digitalisation · convenience
C · Income DistributionWomen · Tier 2/3 · Affluent vs. middle
D · ConsolidationOrganised gains from unorganised
E · New EnginesNew geographies & categories
Resilience tier

Bernstein scenario response

L1 Damocles · L2 Deflation · L3 Deadlock · L4 Displacement

Portfolio construction implication

A portfolio tilted toward Behaviour Shift (B), Consolidation (D), and New Engines (E) is naturally hedged against AI-driven income disruption — without abandoning the consumer and tech thesis.

Driver A (Income-Led Growth) is the primary AI-vulnerable lever. Every holding has been pre-stress-tested; the matrix is the proof of resilience.

Green · hold/build through all AI scenarios Amber · hold L1–L2, monitor L3 Red · reduce L2, exit L3 A · Income-Led Growth B · Behaviour Shift C · Income Distribution D · Consolidation E · New Engines